- The Improving State of the World: Why We're Living
Longer, Healthier, More Comfortable Lives on a Cleaner Planet
(Cato Institute, Washington, DC, 2007).
Precautionary Principle: A Critical Appraisal of Environmental Risk
Assessment (Cato Institute, Washington, DC, 2001).
Food Security & Agriculture
Humanity Unbound: How Fossil Fuels Saved Humanity from Nature and Nature from Humanity. Policy Analysis, No. 715, Cato Institute, Washington, DC (2012).
Is Climate Change the Number One Threat to Humanity? Wiley
Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change (accepted, 2012).
Misled on Climate Change: How the UN IPCC (and others) Exaggerate the Impact of Global Warming, Reason Foundation, Policy Study No. 399, December 2011.
Could Biofuel Policies Increase Death and Disease in Developing Countries? Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 16 (1): 9–13 (2011).
"Technological Substitution and Augmentation of Ecosystem Services,"
in: Simon A. Levin et al. (eds.), The
Princeton Guide to Ecology (Princeton University Press,
Princeton, 2009). Draft.
Hunger in China.” Correspondence. The
Lancet 366: 202-203 (2005).
“Agricultural Technology and the Precautionary Principle.” In R.
Meiners and B. Yandle, eds., Agricultural
Policy and the Environment (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield,
2003), pp. 107-133.
on Farm Scale Evaluations of Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant
Crops to Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (ACRE),
November 15, 2003.
20th Century Trends in U.S. and Global Agricultural Land and Water
Use.” Water International
(3, 2002): 321-329.
and Outs of Organic Farming.” Letter. Science 298 (2002): 1889-1890.
children eat GM rice, or risk blindness from vitamin A deficiency?”
Available at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/322/7279/126/b#EL1
(February 9, 2001). (Coauthored with R. Bate & K. Okonski)
Future of Food.” Forum for
Applied Research and Public Policy 16 (no. 2, 2001): 59-65.
Applying the Precautionary Principle to
Genetically Modified Crops. Center for the Study of American
Business, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo., USA. Policy Study 157.
August 2000. Also published in: Michael Ruse and David Castle,
eds., Genetically Modified Foods:
Debating Biotechnology (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2002),
Without Perversity: A Comprehensive Application of the Precautionary
Principle to Genetically Modified Crops.” Biotechnology Law Report 21 (June
“Agriculture and the Environment: The Pros and Cons of Modern Farming.”
19 (March 2001):
Global Food Needs: The Environmental Trade-offs Between
Increasing Land Conversion and Land Productivity.” In J. Morris and
Bate, eds., Fearing Food: Risk,
Health and Environment (Oxford, UK:
Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999), pp. 256-289. Originally published
in Technology (formerly
Journal of the
6 (1999): 107-130.12-17.
Habitat and Conserving Biodiversity on a Crowded Planet.” BioScience 48 (1998): 941-953.
Habitat, Feeding Humanity.” The
Forum on Applied Research and Public
Policy 13 (Summer 1998): 51-56.
“Technological Progress Increases Food Production.” In S. Barbour, ed.,
Hunger: Current Controversies (San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, 1995),
pp. 118-125. (coauthored with M.W Sprague).
Actions to Conserve Species and Habitat. U. S. Department of
Agriculture and Department of the Interior, 1992. (Coauthored with
“Key Issues Related to Sustainable Development: Reconciling Human
Demands on Land and Other Natural Resources With Those of Nature.”
Background Paper. Department of the Interior, Office of Policy
Analysis, October 1993.
Development and Biodiversity: Productivity, Efficiency and
Conservation, Policy Analysis
No. 175, Cato Institute, Washington, DC,
1992. (Coauthored with M.W. Sprague). [Figures not included.]
Approach to Sustainable
Development: Conserving Forests, Habitat and Biological Diversity by
Increasing the Efficiency and Productivity of Land Utilization.
Office of Program Analysis, Department of the Interior, December
1991.(Coauthored with M.W. Sprague).